Comparing outcomes of plate augmentation, nail exchange, and nail exchange with plate augmentation in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after intramedullary nailing: a multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: Intramedullary (IM) nailing is the treatment of choice for femoral shaft fractures, but nonunion rates have been reported to be as high as 12%. Surgical interventions for nonunion involve exchange nailing or plate augmentation. Recently, a combined treatment of exchange nailing and plate augmentation has demonstrated good results, but its comparative effectiveness remains unclear. This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different surgical interventions for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion, and investigate the factors that affect bone healing after reoperation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at five university hospitals involving 149 patients with aseptic atrophic nonunion after IM nailing. These patients underwent reoperation with plate augmentation, exchange nailing, or combined treatment. Clinical and radiographic outcomes were assessed and compared according to reoperation procedure. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify factors affecting persistent nonunion after reoperation. RESULTS: Of the cohort, 57 patients underwent plate augmentation, 64 underwent exchange nailing, and 28 received combined treatment. There were no significant differences in patient demographics among the groups. Exchange nailing produced a significantly lower union rate than did the combined treatment (82.8% vs. 100%, p = 0.016), whereas no significant difference was observed in the union rate and time to the union between plate augmentation and the combined treatment. Combined treatment showed the longest operative time and the greatest transfusion requirements. The risk factors for persistent nonunion included age, absence of autogenous bone grafts, and use of an exchange nailing technique. CONCLUSIONS: Exchange nailing as a treatment for atrophic femoral shaft nonunion after IM nailing resulted in a lower union rate. The efficacy of the combined treatment requires further study, and persistent nonunion may be influenced by age, bone grafting, and surgical techniques. A comprehensive approach targeting both biological environment and mechanical stability is crucial in the treatment of atrophic femoral shaft nonunion.

Results of a simple treatment protocol for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion in 330 patients.

INTRODUCTION: Our primary aim of the study was to assess the results of a treatment protocol for aseptic femoral shaft nonunion treated by three techniques - Exchange Nailing (EN), Plate Augmentation (PA), and Exchange Nailing combined with Plate augmentation (NP). The secondary objective was to assess the radiological outcome, duration of surgery (DOS) and need for blood transfusion (BT) in all the three groups. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed 330 patients treated for AFNU between Jan 2007 and Dec 2019. Using a simple treatment algorithm, EN, PA and NP were performed in 24,183 and 123 patients respectively. Patients in all the three groups were assessed for radiological-union (union rate and time to union), DOS and BT. RESULTS: Of these 330 patients, 327 (99 %) patients achieved radiological union at a mean duration of 6.07 months. Union rate is highest with NP followed by PA and EN. The union rate in patients with NP, PA and EN were 100 %, 99.5 % and 91.7 % respectively (p < 0.01). Time to union was lowest for NP followed by PA and EN (p < 0.001).The mean time to union for NP, PA and EN were 3.76, 7.2and 9.21 months respectively (p < 0.001). The mean DOS in minutes for NP, EN and PA was 107, 94 and 82 respectively (p < 0.01). The mean need for BT in the form of packed red blood cells for NP, PA and EN were 1.95, 1.87 and 1.38 units respectively (p < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Following a simple algorithm to decide treatment protocol on a case-to case basis helps to achieve good results in an optimal time period. When compared with EN and PA, NP is associated with 100 % union rate with least time to union making NP a reasonably effective procedure with a very high success rate. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Ultrasound assessment of humeral shaft nonunion risk: a feasibility and proof of concept study.

PURPOSE: To determine the feasibility and reliability of ultrasound in the assessment of humeral shaft fracture healing and estimate the accuracy of 6wk ultrasound in predicting nonunion. METHODS: Twelve adults with a non-operatively managed humeral shaft fracture were prospectively recruited and underwent ultrasound scanning at 6wks and 12wks post-injury. Seven blinded observers evaluated sonographic callus appearance to determine intra- and inter-observer reliability. Nonunion prediction accuracy was estimated by comparing images for patients that united (n = 10/12) with those that developed a nonunion (n = 2/12). RESULTS: The mean scan duration was 8 min (5-12) and all patients tolerated the procedure. At 6wks and 12wks, sonographic callus (SC) was present in 11 patients (10 united, one nonunion) and sonographic bridging callus (SBC) in seven (all united). Ultrasound had substantial intra- (weighted kappa: 6wk 0.75; 12wk 0.75) and inter-observer reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient: 6wk 0.60; 12wk 0.76). At 6wks, the absence of SC demonstrated sensitivity 50%, specificity 100%, positive predictive value (PPV) 100% and negative predictive value (NPV) 91% in nonunion prediction (overall accuracy 92%). The absence of SBC demonstrated sensitivity 100%, specificity 70%, PPV 40% and NPV 100% in nonunion prediction (overall accuracy 75%). Of three patients at risk of nonunion (Radiographic Union Score for HUmeral fractures < 8), one had SBC on 6wk ultrasound (that subsequently united) and the others had non-bridging/absent SC (both developed nonunion). CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound assessment of humeral shaft fracture healing was feasible, reliable and may predict nonunion. Ultrasound could be useful in defining nonunion risk among patients with reduced radiographic callus formation.

Fracture related infection (FRI) of the upper extremity correlates with poor bone and soft tissue healing.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the specific course and complication profile following the development of FRI in the upper extremity. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective review was conducted on a consecutive series of operatively managed patients within an academic medical center between 1/2010 and 6/2022. Included patients met the following criteria: (1) upper extremity fracture definitively treated with internal fixation (2) development of criteria for suggestive or confirmatory FRI (as per the FRI Consensus Group) and (3) age ≥ 18 years. Baseline demographics, medical history, injury information, infection characteristics, hospital quality measures, and outcomes were recorded. A 3:1 propensity-matched control cohort of patients without FRI was obtained using the same dataset. Univariable analysis was performed to compare the outcomes (rate of nonunion, time to bone healing, need for soft tissue coverage, patient reported joint stiffness at final follow-up) of the FRI vs Non-FRI cohorts. RESULTS: Of 2827 patients treated operatively for an upper extremity fracture, 43 (1.53%) met criteria for suggestive of confirmatory FRI. The successful propensity match (43 FRI, 129 Non-FRI) revealed no differences in demographics, baseline health status, or fracture location. FRI patients underwent more reoperations (p < 0.001), experienced an increased rate of removal of hardware (p < 0.001), and were admitted more frequently following index operation (p < 0.001). The FRI cohort had higher rates of fracture nonunion (p = 0.003), and a prolonged mean time to bone healing in months (8.37 ± 7.29 FRI vs. 4.14 ± 5.75 Non-FRI, p < 0.001). Additionally, the FRI cohort had a greater need for soft tissue coverage throughout their post-operative fracture treatment (p = 0.014). While there was no difference in eventual bone healing (p = 0.250), FRI patients experienced a higher incidence of affected joint stiffness at final follow-up (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Patients who develop an FRI of the upper extremity undergo more procedures and experience increased complications throughout their treatment, specifically increased joint stiffness. Despite this, ultimate outcome profiles are similar between patients who experience FRI and those who do not following operative repair of an upper extremity fracture. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Risk factors for pubic ramus fracture nonunion after conservative treatment of pelvic ring injuries: a retrospective cohort multicenter study.

PURPOSE: To determine the incidence of nonunion, clinical and radiological outcomes, and risk factors for nonunion in conservatively treated pubic ramus fractures among patients diagnosed with pelvic ring injury. METHODS: A total of 546 patients (192 men, 354 women) diagnosed with pubic ramus fracture, treated conservatively, and who had completed > 1 year follow-up at three level 1 trauma centers between January 2014 and December 2020, were enrolled. Clinical and radiological evaluations were compared between union and nonunion groups. Logistic regression and Kaplan-Meier analyses were used. RESULT: At the final follow-up, 527 (96.5%) and 19 (3.5%) patients had union and nonunion of fractures, respectively. The union and nonunion groups exhibited statistically significant differences in posterior injury (p = 0.040), bilateral ramus fracture (p < 0.001), initial displacement (p < 0.001), and clinical result (p < 0.001). In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, initial displacement (odds ratio, 4.727; p = 0.005) was analyzed as a risk factor for nonunion. According to the Kaplan-Meier analysis, the median initial displacement of nonunion occurrence was 17.9 mm (standard error, 1.211; 95% confidence interval 15.526-20.274), and nonunion patients were included if the displacement was > 15.9 mm (standard error, 1.305) on the 75th percentile. CONCLUSION: Conservative treatment is ineffective in some ramus fracture cases with pelvic ring injury. As ramus nonunion causes functional deterioration, active treatment is required if the displacement is ≥ 16 mm.

Single versus double plate fixation of humeral shaft nonunion.

INTRODUCTION: Humeral shaft fractures are common fractures of the diaphysis of the humerus. The aim of this study was to evaluate factors affecting the clinical outcomes of humeral nonunions surgically treated with open reduction and single- versus double-plate fixation with grafting. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 31 patients with nonunion treated with single- or double-plate screw fixation with bone grafting were retrospectively analysed. The patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment method as Group 1 (single-plate, n = 14) and Group 2 (double-plate, n = 17). Data including demographic and clinical characteristics of the patients, initial and final treatment, type of nonunion and localisation, graft use, shortening, follow-up, time to union, Quick Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (Quick-DASH) scores, and patient-reported cosmetic outcomes were recorded. RESULTS: Of the patients, eight were males, and 23 were females, with a mean age of 47.6 ± 15.8 (range, 20-86) years. Initial treatment was conservative treatment (Sarmiento brace) in seven patients, plate fixation in 22 patients, and intramedullary nailing in two patients. The mean follow-up was 31.0 ± 16.9 months in Group 1 and 25.4 ± 15.6 months in Group 2. There was one nonunion in Group 1 and three in Group 2. There were no significant differences in the union rate and time to union (p = 0.378 and p = 0.262, respectively). The mean Quick-DASH scores and cosmetic results were similar between the groups (p = 0.423 and p = 0.165, respectively). Radial nerve palsy developed in three patients in Group 2, and all these patients recovered completely during follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Although the double-plate fixation technique has similar clinical, radiological, and functional results to single-plate fixation, it is a more invasive and expensive technique with a longer operation time. Therefore, it should not be used as the first-line treatment option for all humeral shaft nonunion. Nevertheless, the double-plate technique may be preferred to achieve in cases requiring high stability, such as hypertrophic nonunion, osteopenia and comminuted fractures.

Outcomes of Humerus Nonunion Surgery in Patients With Initial Operative Fracture Fixation.

OBJECTIVES: To describe outcomes following humerus aseptic nonunion surgery in patients whose initial fracture was treated operatively and to identify risk factors for nonunion surgery failure in the same population. DESIGN: Retrospective case series. SETTING: Eight, academic, level 1 trauma centers. PATIENTS SELECTION CRITERIA: Patients with aseptic humerus nonunion (OTA/AO 11 and 12) after the initial operative management between 1998 and 2019. OUTCOME MEASURES AND COMPARISONS: Success rate of nonunion surgery. RESULTS: Ninety patients were included (56% female; median age 50 years; mean follow-up 21.2 months). Of 90 aseptic humerus nonunions, 71 (78.9%) united following nonunion surgery. Thirty patients (33.3%) experienced 1 or more postoperative complications, including infection, failure of fixation, and readmission. Multivariate analysis found that not performing revision internal fixation during nonunion surgery (n = 8; P = 0.002) and postoperative de novo infection (n = 9; P = 0.005) were associated with an increased risk of recalcitrant nonunion. Patient smoking status and the use of bone graft were not associated with differences in the nonunion repair success rate. CONCLUSIONS: This series of previously operated aseptic humerus nonunions found that more than 1 in 5 patients failed nonunion repair. De novo postoperative infection and failure to perform revision internal fixation during nonunion surgery were associated with recalcitrant nonunion. Smoking and use of bone graft did not influence the success rate of nonunion surgery. These findings can be used to give patients a realistic expectation of results and complications following humerus nonunion surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Postoperative scaphoid alignment, smoking, and avascular necrosis mostly influence union rate after scaphoid reconstruction: Results from a retrospective single center study involving 370 patients.

Current literature does not definitely demonstrate the superiority of any particular scaphoid reconstruction method. The primary goal of this retrospective single center study was to evaluate the influence of reconstruction techniques and other factors on the union rate after reconstruction of scaphoid nonunions. In the study, 370 patients with nonunions classified as stable (Mayo 1) or unstable (Mayo 2) depending on carpal alignment were included. Minimal radiological follow-up was 3 months. Bone healing after scaphoid reconstruction was evaluated using computer tomography scans in 294 and radiograms in 76 patients. Univariate and multivariate logistic regressions were applied in the analysis. Eight statistically significant factors that influenced the union rate were fixation method, type of previous operations, number of all operations, number of reconstructions, smoking, postoperative pathological lateral intrascaphoid angle (LISA>45°), avascular necrosis (AVN), and stability of nonunion. Smoking and postoperative LISA>45° significantly reduced the probability of bone fusion by approximately 4.4 and 9.5 times, respectively. Patients with reduced vascularity in the nonunion site had a 5.2 times lower chance of bone fusion. Our multivariate logistic regression model can explain 32% of failures after scaphoid reconstruction, including postoperative LISA>45°, patients' present record of smoking, and reduced vascularity in the nonunion site. However, bone graft type does not impact the union rate in general; however, in case of AVN, the tendency toward higher union rates was observed for medial femoral condyle free flaps when compared to other types of graft (non-vascularized and pedicled bone grafts considered as one group, p = 0.09).

Comparative analysis of cancellous graft and cortico-cancellous graft in osteosynthesis of scaphoid pseudoarthrosis with plate.

INTRODUCTION: Scaphoid is the most fractured carpal bone, with a 5-10% nonunion rate. Treatment challenges include choosing the implant and graft that best corrects humpback deformity and carpal malalignment with higher chances of bony healing. OBJECTIVE: Compare cortico-cancellous and cancellous grafts between two groups of patients treating scaphoid nonunion with locking plates using autologous bone graft and evaluate bone healing rates and radiographic, tomographic, and functional parameters before and after surgery. METHODS: Non-randomized prospective study including 20 cases of scaphoid nonunion. Groups were divided into Group A (ten patients treated with cortico-cancellous iliac graft) and Group B (ten patients treated with cancellous iliac graft). Patients underwent pre- and postoperative radiographs, computed tomography, and functional evaluation. RESULTS: In postoperative analysis, Group A showed a statistically significant difference in intrascaphoid angle (p = 0.002) and scapholunate angle (p = 0.011) correction when comparing the pre- and postoperative periods. Group B showed a statistically significant difference in intrascaphoid angle (p = 0.002) and scapholunate angle correction (p = 0.0018), grip strength (p = 0.002), and tip pinch strength (p = 0.001) when comparing the pre- and postoperative periods. By comparing both groups, Group B showed a statistically significant difference in intrascaphoid angle correction (p = 0.002), grip strength (p = 0.002), tip pinch strength (p = 0.002), and radial deviation (p = 0.0003). There was no statistical difference when comparing bony healing between groups. CONCLUSION: Scaphoid nonunion treatment with a locking plate was effective, showing a high bony healing rate and improved carpal alignment in imaging tests for both graft types. However, results for intrascaphoid angle correction, grip strength, tip pinch strength, and radial deviation were better in Group B. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV, case series.

Infection and Nonunion Following Operative Treatment of Lateral Humeral Condyle Fractures.

BACKGROUND: Lateral humeral condyle fractures (LHCF) are the second most frequent type of pediatric elbow fracture. The purpose of this study is to characterize infections and nonunions of LHCF treated at a single institution. This is the largest series on infections and nonunions of LHCF to date. METHODS: Pediatric patients undergoing surgical treatment for a LHCF from 2012 to 2022 at a single children's hospital were identified for a retrospective review. Patients who were diagnosed with an active infection or nonunion after surgery were included. Data collected included demographics, original treatment course, presentation, effective treatments, outcomes, and timing of events. RESULTS: Out of 863 surgical patients, 12 (1.4%) patients developed 13 infections: 8 were diagnosed with superficial cellulitis, 3 with soft tissue infections, and 2 with osteomyelitis. Eleven fractures were stabilized with percutaneous pins and 1 with buried pins. The average time to infection diagnosis was 29 days and the most common presenting symptom was increased or new onset of pain. All 12 patients received antibiotics for an average 18 days, 6 required hospital admission, 3 required surgical incision and drainage, and 2 required intravenous antibiotics without admission. One patient that developed osteomyelitis developed a nonunion. Ten (1.2%) surgical patients developed nonunion. There were 3 Weiss type II fractures and 7 type III fractures. On average, nonunions were diagnosed 12 weeks after initial treatment. Nine patients underwent nonunion surgery, and all went on to union. Patient's elbows were immobilized for an average 16 weeks and at least 5 patients required an average of 10 physical therapy sessions to regain their range of motion. CONCLUSION: Infection and nonunion are rare complications of LHCF, but greatly change the timeline and number of healthcare interactions required for healing. Infectious complications typically require admission, additional surgery, or emergency department visits. Nonunions require extensive cast time, additional surgery, and rehabilitation. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV - case series.

Antibiotic cement-coated rigid locked nails in infected femoral and tibial nonunion. Reoperation rates of commercial versus custom-made nails.

INTRODUCTION: The objective of this study is to assess bone union, infection control, and reoperation rates in a series of patients with infected femoral or tibial nonunion treated with antibiotic-cement-coated rigid nails and to compare the results obtained with custom-made nails versus commercial nails. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed a series of consecutive patients with infected nonunion of the femur or the tibia treated with antibiotic-cement-coated rigid nails between January 2010 and 2020. We assessed patients' distinctive characteristics, initial injury, type of nail used (custom-made nail with vancomycin or commercial nail with gentamicin), success rate (bone union + infection control), reoperation rate, and failure rate. Comparative analyses were conducted between reoperated and non-reoperated patients regarding the type of nail used. A multivariate regression analysis was performed to assess the risk variables that impacted reoperation rates. RESULTS: We included 54 patients with 22 (40.74%) infected femoral nonunions and 32 (59.25%) tibial nonunions, who were treated with 38 (70.37%) custom-made antibiotic-cement coated nails and 16 (29.62%) commercial nails. Bone union and infection control were achieved in 51 (94.44%) cases. The reoperation rate was 40.74% (n = 22), and the failure rate was 5.55% (n = 3). The use of custom-made nails was associated with a higher risk of reoperation (Odds Ratio 4.71; 95% Confidence Interval 1.10 - 20.17; p = 0.036). CONCLUSION: Antibiotic-cement-coated nails reached a 94.44% success rate. Nails manufactured in the OR coated with vancomycin cement were associated with a higher risk of reoperation than commercial nails loaded with gentamicin cement. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III comparative, observational, non-randomized.

Double screw versus angular stable plate fixation of scaphoid waist nonunions in combination with intraoperative extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT).

INTRODUCTION: Over the past years, different fixation techniques focused on rotational stability in order to increase stability and stimulate union rates. Additionally, extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) has gained importance in the treatment of delayed and nonunions. Purpose of this study was to compare the radiological and clinical outcome of two headless compression screws (HCS) and plate fixation in scaphoid nonunions, in combination with intraoperative high energy ESWT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty-eight patients with scaphoid nonunions were treated by using a nonvascularized bone graft from the iliac crest and stabilization with either two HCS or a volar angular stable scaphoid plate. All patients received one ESWT session with 3000 impulses and energy flux per pulse of 0.41 mJ/mm2 intraoperatively. Clinical assessment included range of motion (ROM), pain according to the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), grip strength, disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand Score, Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation Score, Michigan Hand Outcomes Questionnaire and modified Green O'Brien (Mayo) Wrist Score. To confirm union, a CT scan of the wrist was performed. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients returned for clinical and radiological examination. Out of these, 29 (91%) showed bony union. All patients treated with two HCS compared to 16 out of 19 (84%) patients treated by plate showed bony union on the CT scans. The difference was not statistically significant. However, at a mean follow-up interval of 34 months, no significant differences could be found in ROM, pain, grip strength and patient-reported outcome measurements between the two HCS and plate group. Height-to-length ratio and capitolunate angle improved significantly in both groups compared to preoperative. CONCLUSIONS: Scaphoid nonunion stabilization by using two HCS or angular stable volar plate fixation and intraoperative ESWT results in comparable high union rates and good functional outcome. Due to the higher rate for a secondary intervention (plate removal), HCS might be preferable as first choice, whereas the scaphoid plate fixation should be reserved for recalcitrant (substantial bone loss, humpback deformity or failed prior surgical intervention) scaphoid nonunions.

Arthroscopic treatment of unstable scaphoid fracture and nonunion with two headless compression screws and distal radius bone graft.

BACKGROUND: The treatment of unstable scaphoid fracture and nonunion remains a challenging problem for hand surgeons. Minimally invasive treatment has become the preferred method of treatment. PURPOSE: This study introduces the arthroscopic technique with two headless compression screws (HCS) fixation and distal radius bone grafting for the treatment of unstable scaphoid fracture and nonunion, aiming to evaluate its clinical and radiological outcomes. METHODS: It was a retrospective study. From January 2019 to February 2021, a total of 23 patients were included in the current study. Among them, 13 patients with unstable scaphoid fracture underwent arthroscopic treatment with two HCS; 10 patients with scaphoid nonunion underwent arthroscopic treatment with two HCS and a distal radius bone graft. The range of motion of the wrist, visual analog scale (VAS), grip strength, the Modified Mayo Wrist Score (MMWS), the Patient-Rated Wrist Evaluation (PRWE) score, and the Disability of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) score were collected at preoperatively and the final follow-up. A computed tomography scan of the wrist was performed on each patient to analyze for union and postoperative osteoarthritis during the follow-up period. RESULTS: Significant improvement was only observed in wrist extension. Clinical outcomes including grip strength, VAS pain score, MMWS, PRWE score, and DASH score were significantly improved at the final follow-up. In the subgroup analysis, both patients stabilized with either two HCS or a distal radius bone graft and two HCS have improved clinical outcomes after surgery, respectively. All patients achieved union. No screw fixation failure occurred, and no other postoperative complication was observed in any of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: The arthroscopic technique with two-HCS fixation and distal radius bone grafting is a reliable and effective technique for the treatment of unstable scaphoid fracture and nonunion, providing satisfactory union rates and clinical outcomes.

Suitability of skin traction combined with braces for treating femoral shaft fractures in 3-5 years old children.

BACKGROUND: In children aged 3-5 years, femoral fractures are common and are frequently treated using flexible intramedullary nails (FIN) or spica casting. Recently, more surgeons have been relying on FIN surgery because of the high rate of complications associated with spica casts, such as skin irritation and re-adjustment surgery. We aimed to evaluate the effect of skin traction combined with braces in 3-5 years old children at our hospital. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 125 children aged 3-5 years with femoral shaft fractures treated at our hospital between January 2010 and December 2020. We assigned 68 patients who underwent FIN surgery to Group A and 57 patients treated with skin traction and braces to Group B. Comparative analysis included the children's age, sex, side of the affected limb, cause of fracture, function of the knee joint, healing time of the fracture, duration of hospitalization, cost of hospitalization, and complications. The complications evaluated included joint dysfunction, pain, infection, pressure ulcers, angular deformities, limb length differences, re-fractures, nonunion fractures, and delayed union. RESULTS: There were significant differences in and hospital costs (p = 0.001). Conversely, no statistically significant differences were observed in sex (p = 0.858), injury type (p = 0.804), age (p = 0.231), hospitalization time (p = 0.071), bone healing time (p = 0.212), and complications. Pressure ulcers, nonunion fractures, and delayed union did not occur in both groups. CONCLUSION: Both methods had similar therapeutic effects and postoperative complications in children aged 3-5 years with femoral shaft fractures. Therefore, skin traction combined with braces is recommended for this population and for patients hospitalized in institutions where several beds are available, with a consequent possibility of prolonged hospitalization. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IV.

Operative outcomes of a high-grade talar neck fracture - Lessons from 20 years' clinical experience in a single, tertiary hospital.

BACKGROUND: The operative treatment of high-grade talar neck fractures remains challenging, despite numerous previous reports. Our goal was to determine long-term outcomes and to establish a plan for management of postoperative complications (especially, avascular necrosis [AVN] of talar body) after high-grade talar neck fractures. We hypothesized that not every case with AVN of talar body require secondary surgical interventions. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the radiographic and clinical findings of 14 patients who underwent operative treatment for high-grade talar neck fractures (modified Hawkins type III and IV) between January 2000 and December 2017. The minimum follow-up duration for inclusion was 3 years. Using radiographs during follow-up, we assessed the development of AVN of the talar body, malunion, nonunion, and posttraumatic osteoarthritis. Information about the secondary operations and their outcomes were also investigated using visual analogue scale (VAS) and American orthopaedic foot and ankle society (AOFAS) ankle-hindfoot scale at the final follow-up. RESULTS: In 10 of 14 patients (71.4 %), talar body AVN developed during follow-up. However, secondary operation was required in only 30.0 % (3 of 10 patients). In the remaining 7 patients who did not undergo secondary operation, the symptoms were tolerable with a maximum of 89 months follow-up; although the talar body presented sclerotic changes, but without talar dome collapse. The rates of malunion and post-traumatic subtalar osteoarthritis were 21.4 % and 14.3 %, respectively. No patients presented with fracture site nonunion. After a mean of 55.86 ± 14.45 months (range, 37-89) follow-up, the final mean VAS and AOFAS scores were 3.07 ± 0.73 (range, 2-4) and 80.43 ± 3.11 (range, 75-85), respectively. CONCLUSION: We recommend leaving talar body AVN untouched, unless the patient's symptoms become intolerable. In our clinical practice, postoperative AVN could be stably maintained without talar dome collapse for more than 7 years, although the sclerotic change persisted. Despite the small number of patients, our clinical experience may benefit patients with high-grade talar neck fractures and surgeons who treat such rare, serious, and challenging foot injuries. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level IV, Case series.

Operative fixation of rib fracture nonunions.

INTRODUCTION: Rib fractures are common injuries in trauma patients that often heal without intervention. Infrequently, symptomatic rib fracture nonunions are a complication after rib fractures. There is a paucity of literature on the surgical treatment of rib fracture nonunion. The purpose of this study was to describe the efficacy of rib fracture nonunion operative fixation with particular focus on surgical technique, healing rates, and complications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients aged ≥ 18 years with symptomatic rib fracture nonunions treated with open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF) with locking plates at a single urban level 1 trauma center were retrospectively reviewed. Pertinent demographic, clinical, radiographic, and surgical data were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 18 patients met inclusion criteria. The mean time from injury to undergoing ORIF for rib fracture nonunion was just under a year and the number of ribs plated was 2.95 ± 1.16 (1-5 ribs) with bone grafting used in six cases. All patients (100%) showed evidence of healing at an average of 2.65 ± 1.50 months (2-8 months). All patients reported a decrease in pain. No narcotic pain medication was used at an average of 3.88 ± 3.76 weeks (0-10 weeks) post-operatively. Intraoperative and postoperative complications were found in 4 (22.2%) patients. CONCLUSION: This study concluded that operative fixation of symptomatic rib fracture nonunion demonstrated favorable outcomes with reduction in preoperative pain levels, decreased use of narcotic pain medication, minimal complications, and a high rate of fracture union. This described method provides symptomatic relief, reduction in pain, and promotes bony healing of the fracture nonunion without development of major complications. We suggest that operative fixation should be considered as the primary method of treatment of symptomatic rib nonunions.

Combination of radiographic apparent bone gap and nonunion risk determination score improves accuracy of prediction of tibial shaft delayed union.

BACKGROUND: There is a need for a novel therapeutic strategy for an earlier prediction of long bone union failure as compared to previous methodologies. This study aimed to determine whether a combination of two diagnostic tools would result in a more accurate diagnosis of delayed union. METHODS: The inclusion criteria were as follows: patients with tibial shaft fracture who underwent treatment with intramedullary nailing (IMN) as definitive internal fixation (IF). The study included a total of 114 patients with 116 tibial shaft fractures treated with IMN as definitive IF. Radiographic apparent bone gap (RABG) and nonunion risk determination score (NURDS) can be used to predict nonunion. However, this study aimed to determine whether combination of RABG and NURDS could help deduce a more accurate prediction of delayed union. RESULTS: The union rate was found to be 85% (99 fractures), the delayed union rate was found to be 15% (17 fractures), and the rate of nonunion requiring additional surgical intervention was estimated to be 4% (5 out of the 17 delayed union cases). Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of RABG were found to be 82.3%, 76.0%, 36.8%, and 96.2%, respectively, when an RABG cutoff value of 5.0 mm was applied to our patient cohort. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of NURDS were found to be 47.1%, 82.0%, 30.8%, and 90.1%, respectively, when a NURDS cutoff value of 8.0% was applied to our patient cohort. When RABG and NURDS were above their respective cutoff values, the sensitivity and PPV were estimated to be 90.0% and 56.3%, respectively. When RABG and NURDS were below their respective cutoff values, the specificity and NPV were estimated to be 90.1% and 98.5%, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of RABG and NURDS evaluation immediately after surgery helps surgeons identify patients who are at a high risk of delayed union, facilitating careful monitoring of these patients and consideration of additional treatments.

Nonunion of conservatively treated humeral shaft fractures is not associated with anatomic location and fracture pattern.

INTRODUCTION: Humeral shaft fractures make up 1-3% of all fractures and are most often treated nonoperatively; rates of union have been suggested to be greater than 85%. It has been postulated that proximal third fractures are more susceptible to nonunion development; however, current evidence is conflicting and presented in small cohorts. It is our hypothesis that anatomic site of fracture and fracture pattern are not associated with development of nonunion. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a retrospective cohort study, 147 consecutive patients treated nonoperatively for a humeral shaft fracture were assessed for development of nonunion during their treatment course. Their charts were reviewed for demographic and radiographic parameters such as age, sex, current tobacco use, diabetic comorbidity, fracture location, fracture pattern, AO/OTA classification, and need for intervention for nonunion. RESULTS: One hundred and forty-seven patients with 147 nonoperatively treated humeral shaft fractures were eligible for this study and included: 39 distal, 65 middle, and 43 proximal third fractures. One hundred and twenty-six patients healed their fractures by a mean 16 ± 6.4 weeks. Of the 21 patients who developed a nonunion, two were of the distal third, 10 of the middle third, and nine were of the proximal third. In a binomial logistic regression analysis, there were no differences in age, sex, tobacco use, diabetic comorbidity, fracture pattern, anatomic location, and OTA fracture classification between patients in the union and nonunion cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Fracture pattern and anatomic location of nonoperatively treated humeral shaft fractures were not related to development of fracture nonunion.

Modified use of the proximal humeral internal locking system (PHILOS) plate for distal femoral nonunions.

PURPOSE: Nonunion is a common complication after a distal femoral fracture (DFF). Standard treatment consists of revision plating and/or bone grafting. Single lateral plating for a distal femoral nonunion can be insufficient in case of a persistent medial gap and compromised bone stock. Alternatively, dual plating can be used to treat a distal femoral nonunion, but to date there is no Gold standard. The aim of our study was to report our results after use of a minimally invasively placed proximal humeral internal locking system (Philos) plate as a medial buttress in the treatment of a distal femoral nonunion. METHODS: Fifteen adult patients with a distal femoral nonunion were prospectively entered in a trauma database and retrospectively assessed. All patients underwent a similar operation, which included removal of failed hardware, nonunion debridement, fixation with a lateral plate, and a medial Philos plate combined with bone grafting. Data collected included union rate, time to union, complications and functional outcome. RESULTS: In twelve out of fifteen patients (80%), the fracture united after our index operation. Median time to union was 4.8 months (range 1.6-15). Three patients (20%) needed additional bone grafting surgery. One patient underwent a Judet quadricepsplasty. CONCLUSION: This study suggests that the Philos plate is a safe and effective adjunct as a medial buttress plate for distal femoral nonunions.

Donor-Site Morbidity for Iliac Crest Harvesting for Pediatric Scaphoid Nonunion.

PURPOSE: Screw fixation with iliac crest bone grafting (ICBG) is a well-studied treatment for pediatric scaphoid nonunions. Studies in adults, as well as in pediatric spine fusions, have demonstrated high rates of complications with ICBG, including longer-term donor site pain. We hypothesized that in pediatric patients undergoing ICBG for scaphoid nonunion, the donor site complication rate would be lower than that reported in other populations. METHODS: Records of patients ages 0-18 years at a single institution undergoing surgical reconstruction for scaphoid nonunion from 1995 to 2016 were reviewed. Patient and surgical variables were recorded, including how ICBG was harvested. Donor site complications were recorded, including donor site pain beyond 30 days after surgery, infection, peri-incisional or lower extremity numbness at any point after surgery and reoperation at the donor site at any time point after surgery. RESULTS: During the study period, 119 wrists in 117 patients underwent internal fixation and ICBG for scaphoid nonunion. The average age was 16 years; mean follow-up was 1 year. The majority of wrists (73, 62.9%) underwent harvest of both outer and inner tables of the iliac crest; 38 (31.9%) had only outer table harvested; 5 (4.3%) had only cancellous graft harvested. Ten wrists (8.4%) had a donor site complication. The most common donor site complication was donor site pain beyond 30 days after surgery (5, 4.2%), followed by numbness (4, 3.4%). No infections, seromas, or reoperations at the donor site occurred. In comparison to those subjects who did not experience complications, we found no difference based on the age at surgery or the type of graft used. Female patients were more likely to have a recorded complication than males. CONCLUSIONS: Donor site morbidity for iliac crest grafting in pediatric patients undergoing scaphoid nonunion surgery appears to be lower than that previously reported in adult patients. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic IV.